The same image has been displayed on various "bad parenting" websites since at least 2009. While the image is certainly disturbing, there is no evidence to suggest that the baby was in any actual danger. Many commentators have pointed out that the gun may be a toy since a real handgun would likely be too heavy for a child of that age to hold up. The image may depict nothing more than an ill-conceived joke or a single moment of parental foolishness.
A photograph, which depicts a baby holding a large handgun in his or her mouth, is currently going viral via social media. The image shows the gun-toting baby cradled on the lap of a smiling and apparently unconcerned mother.
The description that comes with the photograph asks people to share it in the hope that the errant mother can be exposed and appropriately dealt with by police. The image has caused furious debate, with many angst-ridden commentators baying for the young mother's blood.
Certainly, the picture is rather disturbing. But, in reality, no meaningful conclusions about the welfare of the pictured child or of the mother's ability as a parent can be formed by viewing this picture in isolation.
The very same image has been published on various "bad parenting" forums since at least 2009, so the incident depicted in the photograph is not recent. It is unclear why the person who created the current Facebook message decided to resurrect it several years on.
And, there is no evidence to suggest that the baby is in any danger. Many credible commentators have pointed out that a real handgun of that size would likely be too heavy for such a young child to hold in the way depicted. Thus, it is possible that the gun is just a toy.
It seems likely that the image depicts a single instance of parental foolishness now captured forever and set to circulate for years on end. Perhaps, the picture records nothing more than an amazingly foolish and ill-conceived prank.
And, the calls for violent and bloody retribution against the mother, all based on conclusions drawn from a single photograph, are, to this writer at least, considerably more disturbing than the photograph itself. Internet vigilantism of this nature is potentially dangerous and serves no good purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment